IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 46
Trong cấu trúc kỳ thi IELTS, kỹ năng viết thường là thách thức lớn nhất đối với phần lớn thí sinh, đặc biệt ở phần IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 46 – nơi yêu cầu không chỉ khả năng ngôn ngữ mà còn là tư duy lập luận chặt chẽ. Việc hiểu rõ tiêu chí chấm điểm, nắm bắt yêu cầu đề bài và phát triển ý một cách mạch lạc là yếu tố then chốt giúp nâng cao band điểm, nhất là trong bối cảnh cạnh tranh ngày càng cao hiện nay. Đọc thêm: IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 45. Đề 1 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people think that public transport should be free to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Bài essay (Band 6.5) In recent years, traffic congestion and air pollution have become serious problems in many cities. Some people believe that making public transport free would help solve these issues. I partly agree with this idea because while free transport can bring benefits, it may also create other challenges. On the one hand, providing free public transportation can encourage more people to leave their private cars at home. As a result, the number of vehicles on the road may decrease, which can help reduce traffic jams and pollution from car exhausts. This policy can especially benefit low-income citizens who rely on buses or trains to travel to work or school. On the other hand, making public transport free may lead to overcrowding and high maintenance costs. If too many people use buses or trains, the quality of service may go down. Additionally, the government would need to spend a lot of money to maintain the system, which might reduce funding for other important services like healthcare or education. In some cases, people might misuse the system because it is free, which could cause more harm than good. In conclusion, while free public transport has the potential to reduce traffic and pollution, it is not a perfect solution. A better approach may be to reduce fares and improve the service quality to attract more users without causing negative side effects. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5Bài viết trả lời đúng trọng tâm đề bài, có quan điểm rõ ràng (partly agree). Lập luận hợp lý nhưng thiếu chiều sâu, ví dụ chưa thật cụ thể. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5Cấu trúc bài rõ ràng, các đoạn kết nối mượt mà. Tuy nhiên, từ nối còn đơn giản và bị lặp lại (“on the other hand”, “while”). Lexical Resource: 6.5Từ vựng đủ dùng để diễn đạt ý tưởng. Một số cụm từ học thuật được sử dụng đúng, nhưng còn lặp từ (“free”, “public transport”). Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.0Sử dụng được một số cấu trúc câu phức hợp, nhưng còn lỗi nhẹ về thì và từ nối. Phạm vi ngữ pháp chưa thực sự đa dạng. Phân tích từ vựng (in đậm + dịch + giải thích) Phân tích ngữ pháp (in đậm + giải thích tiếng Việt) Tổng kết & gợi ý cải thiện Bài viết thể hiện rõ quan điểm và có cấu trúc hợp lý, phù hợp với Band 6.5. Tuy nhiên, để nâng lên Band 7.0, người viết nên: Đề 2 IELTS Writing Task 2 In many countries, young people are choosing not to vote. What are the reasons for this, and what can be done to encourage them to vote? (Problem-Solution) Bài essay (Band 6.5) In modern society, it is becoming more common for young people to avoid voting in national or local elections. This trend is worrying because voting is an important part of democracy. This essay will discuss some reasons why young people do not vote and suggest ways to increase their participation. One main reason is that many young individuals feel disconnected from politics. They think politicians do not represent their views or care about their issues such as education, employment, or climate change. As a result, they feel that voting does not make any real difference. Another reason is the lack of knowledge. Many young people do not understand how the political system works or how to register to vote. To solve this problem, governments and schools can play a big role. For example, schools should include political education in the curriculum to help students understand the value of voting. Governments can also run awareness campaigns on social media, where young people spend a lot of their time. These campaigns should explain the voting process in simple ways and show how each vote can lead to change. In conclusion, the lack of interest and understanding are key reasons why young people do not vote. Education and modern communication tools can be effective in encouraging them to take part in elections. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5Bài viết trả lời đúng yêu cầu của đề bài, đưa ra nguyên nhân và giải pháp rõ ràng. Tuy nhiên, luận điểm chưa được khai triển sâu sắc, thiếu ví dụ thực tế cụ thể. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5Cấu trúc đoạn rõ ràng, liên kết ý mạch lạc. Tuy nhiên, từ nối còn đơn giản và bị lặp (“for example”, “as a result”). Lexical Resource: 6.5Từ vựng đủ dùng, có một số cụm học thuật phù hợp. Tuy nhiên, một số từ/cụm bị lặp và thiếu tính đa dạng. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.0Ngữ pháp nhìn chung chính xác, có sử dụng câu phức và bị động, nhưng phạm vi cấu trúc còn hạn chế và đôi lúc thiếu linh hoạt. Phân tích từ vựng (in đậm + dịch + giải thích) Phân tích ngữ pháp (in đậm + giải thích tiếng Việt) Tổng kết & gợi ý cải thiện Bài viết phù hợp Band 6.5 với cấu trúc rõ ràng, từ vựng và ngữ pháp ở mức đủ để truyền đạt ý. Tuy nhiên: Đề 3 IELTS Writing Task 3 Some people believe that it is better to work
IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 45
Trong kỳ thi IELTS, kỹ năng lập luận và tổ chức ý tưởng rõ ràng đóng vai trò then chốt trong việc đạt điểm cao ở phần viết. Đặc biệt, IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 45 yêu cầu thí sinh không chỉ nắm vững cấu trúc bài luận mà còn thể hiện tư duy phản biện mạch lạc và dẫn chứng phù hợp. Việc hiểu rõ yêu cầu đề bài và biết cách triển khai luận điểm một cách logic là nền tảng để cải thiện hiệu quả kỹ năng viết học thuật. Đọc thêm: IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 44. Đề 1 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people believe that the best way to encourage children to study is to reward them for good grades. Others, however, think that praising effort is more effective. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) Encouraging children to study is a key concern for parents and teachers. Some argue that rewarding good grades is the best approach, while others believe praising effort is more effective. This essay will discuss both perspectives and explain why I think a combination of both methods is ideal. On the one hand, supporters of rewarding grades argue that it motivates students to work harder. For example, giving gifts or money for high marks can make children aim for better results. This method is effective because it provides tangible incentives, which appeal to young learners. In some cultures, parents use rewards to instill a sense of achievement, helping children associate studying with positive outcomes. On the other hand, those who favor praising effort believe it builds long-term resilience. Recognizing hard work, regardless of results, encourages children to keep trying. For instance, a student who struggles but persists may feel valued when their effort is acknowledged. This approach can foster intrinsic motivation, as children learn to value the process of learning rather than just grades. In my opinion, both methods have merits, but combining them is most effective. Rewarding grades can boost short-term performance, while praising effort supports long-term growth. For example, a child could receive a small reward for good marks and praise for their hard work. In conclusion, a balanced approach that uses both rewards and praise is the best way to encourage children to study. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, meeting the task requirements. However, the arguments are somewhat general, with examples like “gifts or money” lacking depth. The conclusion summarizes well but does not add new insights, limiting the score to 6.5. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is logically structured with clear paragraphs. Linking words like “for example” and “on the other hand” are used appropriately, but transitions between ideas (e.g., from rewards to effort) are slightly abrupt. Some repetition of ideas reduces cohesion. Lexical Resource: 6.5The vocabulary is appropriate for Band 6.5, with academic phrases like foster intrinsic motivation and tangible incentives. However, there is some repetition (e.g., “children” and “study” appear frequently), and the absence of higher-level synonyms prevents a Band 7 score. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.5The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentences with generally accurate grammar. Minor errors, such as “instill a sense of achievement” (slightly formal for context), and limited use of advanced structures (e.g., conditionals) keep the score at 6.5. Phân tích từ vựng Phân tích ngữ pháp Tổng kết & gợi ý cải thiện Tổng kết: Bài viết đạt Band 6.5 nhờ cấu trúc rõ ràng, từ vựng phù hợp, và lập luận cơ bản. Tuy nhiên, các lỗi nhỏ trong từ vựng (lặp từ, cụm chưa tối ưu), ngữ pháp (thiếu cấu trúc phức tạp), và ví dụ chung chung khiến bài chưa đạt Band 7. (Nhận xét này dựa trên tiêu chí Cambridge, nhưng một số yếu tố như mức độ thuyết phục có thể phụ thuộc vào giám khảo.) Gợi ý cải thiện để đạt Band 7: Đề 2 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people think that governments should invest more in public transportation to reduce traffic congestion. Others, however, believe that building more roads is a better solution. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) Traffic congestion is a growing problem in many cities, and there are different opinions on how to address it. Some argue that governments should prioritize public transportation, while others believe that building more roads is more effective. This essay will discuss both views and explain why I support greater investment in public transport. On the one hand, supporters of public transportation argue that it can significantly reduce the number of vehicles on roads. Efficient systems like buses and trains can carry many passengers at once, which helps decrease traffic jams. For example, cities with well-developed metro systems often have less congestion. Moreover, public transport is environmentally friendly, as it produces fewer emissions compared to private cars. On the other hand, those who favor building more roads claim that it accommodates growing populations. As cities expand, the demand for road space increases. Wider roads or new highways can help traffic flow more smoothly. For instance, some countries have reduced congestion by constructing ring roads around cities. However, this solution may only work in the short term, as more roads can encourage more car use. In my opinion, investing in public transportation is the better long-term solution. It not only reduces congestion but also promotes sustainable development. Governments should focus on affordable and reliable transport systems to encourage people to leave their cars at home. In conclusion, while building roads may help, public transportation is the most effective way to tackle traffic congestion. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, fulfilling the task. However, the arguments are somewhat general, with examples like “cities with metro systems” lacking specificity. The conclusion summarizes well but does not add new insights, limiting the score to 6.5. Coherence and Cohesion:
IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 44
Trong quá trình chinh phục band điểm cao, kỹ năng lập luận và trình bày quan điểm rõ ràng đóng vai trò then chốt, đặc biệt ở phần IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 44 – nơi thí sinh phải kết hợp tư duy phản biện với cấu trúc bài viết mạch lạc. Thực tế cho thấy, ngay cả những thí sinh đạt band 7.0+ vẫn có thể mất điểm nếu không nắm chắc tiêu chí chấm điểm và cách triển khai luận điểm một cách thuyết phục. Đọc thêm: IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 43. Đề 1 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people believe that technology has made communication easier and more effective. Others argue that it has created barriers to genuine human interaction. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) Technology has transformed the way people communicate, but its impact is debated. Some believe it enhances communication, while others think it hinders genuine interaction. This essay will discuss both perspectives and provide my opinion. On the one hand, supporters of technology argue that it facilitates communication across distances. For example, apps like WhatsApp allow instant messaging and video calls, connecting people globally. This is especially useful for families living apart or businesses working remotely. Additionally, technology streamlines information sharing, as emails and social media enable quick updates. However, over-reliance on devices may reduce face-to-face interaction. On the other hand, critics claim that technology creates barriers to meaningful connection. People often prioritize texting over personal conversations, which can weaken relationships. For instance, many young people spend hours on smartphones, leading to social isolation. Moreover, online communication lacks emotional depth, as tone and body language are absent. However, some argue that technology can still foster closeness if used thoughtfully. In my opinion, technology is a double-edged sword. It enhances connectivity for those far apart, but it can harm relationships if it replaces real-world interaction. People should balance digital and personal communication to maintain genuine connections. In conclusion, while technology makes communication faster and more accessible, it can reduce the quality of human interaction. A balanced approach, combining technology with face-to-face contact, is the best way to ensure effective communication. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, meeting the task requirements. Examples (e.g., WhatsApp, smartphones) are relevant, but some points (e.g., emotional depth) are underdeveloped. To reach Band 7, deeper analysis and more specific evidence are needed. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is well-organized with clear paragraphs and linking words (e.g., “Additionally,” “On the other hand”). However, transitions between ideas are sometimes abrupt, and repetition of “communication” weakens cohesion. Band 7 requires smoother transitions and more varied cohesive devices. Lexical Resource: 6.5Vocabulary is appropriate with some academic phrases (e.g., facilitates communication, barriers to meaningful connection), but there is repetition (e.g., “communication” appears often). Minor word choice issues (e.g., “thoughtfully” is vague) limit the score. Band 7 needs a wider vocabulary range and precise collocations. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.5The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentences (e.g., people often prioritize texting over). Most sentences are accurate, but minor errors (e.g., “can still foster closeness” lacks clarity) and limited complex structures prevent a higher score. Band 7 requires more varied sentence types and fewer errors. Phân tích từ vựng Phân tích ngữ pháp Tổng kết & gợi ý cải thiện Tổng kết: Bài essay đạt Band 6.5 nhờ cấu trúc rõ ràng, từ vựng học thuật phù hợp, và lập luận đáp ứng yêu cầu đề bài. Tuy nhiên, các ý chưa được phát triển sâu, từ vựng lặp lại (e.g., “communication”), và một số lỗi ngữ pháp nhỏ hạn chế điểm số. Gợi ý cải thiện để đạt Band 7: Đề 2 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people believe that the best way to encourage healthy lifestyles is to impose taxes on unhealthy foods. Others argue that education and awareness campaigns are more effective. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) Promoting healthy lifestyles is a growing concern in many countries. Some argue that taxing unhealthy foods is the best approach, while others believe education and awareness campaigns are more effective. This essay will discuss both views and present my opinion. On the one hand, supporters of taxing unhealthy foods claim it can deter unhealthy eating habits. For example, higher prices on sugary drinks in countries like Mexico have reduced their consumption. Taxes also generate revenue, which governments can use to fund health programs. However, this approach may unfairly affect low-income families, who rely on cheaper, less healthy foods. On the other hand, those who favor education argue that it raises awareness about healthy choices. School programs and media campaigns can teach people about nutrition, encouraging them to adopt balanced diets. For instance, campaigns in Australia have increased vegetable consumption among children. Education is also less punitive than taxes and benefits everyone equally. However, its impact may be slow, as changing habits takes time. In my opinion, education is more effective than taxes. While taxes may reduce consumption, they do not address the root causes of unhealthy eating, such as lack of knowledge. Awareness campaigns can inspire long-term change by empowering individuals to make better choices. In conclusion, taxing unhealthy foods can discourage poor dietary habits, but education and awareness campaigns are more sustainable. Focusing on knowledge and empowerment is the best way to promote healthy lifestyles. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, meeting the task requirements. Examples (e.g., Mexico, Australia) are relevant, but some points (e.g., impact on low-income families) are underdeveloped. To reach Band 7, deeper analysis and more specific evidence are needed. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is logically organized with clear paragraphs and linking words (e.g., “For example,” “On the other hand”). However, transitions between ideas could be smoother, and repetition of “healthy” weakens cohesion. Band 7 requires more varied cohesive devices and seamless
IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 43
Kỹ năng lập luận và tư duy phản biện ngày càng đóng vai trò then chốt trong việc đạt điểm cao ở IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 43. Đây không chỉ là phần thi đòi hỏi vốn từ vựng học thuật và cấu trúc ngữ pháp chuẩn xác, mà còn yêu cầu thí sinh trình bày quan điểm một cách logic, mạch lạc. Việc hiểu rõ tiêu chí chấm điểm cùng các dạng đề thường gặp là bước đầu tiên để cải thiện hiệu quả kỹ năng viết trong kỳ thi này. Đọc thêm: IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 42. Đề 1 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people believe that children should be taught practical life skills, such as cooking or financial management, at school. Others argue that schools should focus on academic subjects to prepare students for higher education. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) Education plays a crucial role in preparing young people for the future. Some argue that schools should teach practical life skills like cooking or financial management, while others believe that academic subjects are more important for university preparation. This essay will discuss both perspectives and provide my opinion. On the one hand, teaching life skills at school can equip students with essential abilities. For example, learning to cook helps students maintain a healthy diet, while financial management teaches them how to budget and save. These skills are useful in daily life and can promote independence, especially for students who move away from home. However, adding these subjects might reduce time for academic learning, which could affect exam results. On the other hand, focusing on academic subjects prepares students for higher education. Subjects like math, science, and literature develop critical thinking and knowledge needed for university courses. For instance, strong academic performance can open doors to better opportunities, such as scholarships. However, this approach may leave students unprepared for practical challenges, like managing household tasks. In my opinion, schools should balance both approaches. While academic subjects are vital for intellectual growth, practical skills are equally important for personal development. A curriculum that includes both would best serve students’ needs. In conclusion, although academic subjects are essential for university preparation, practical life skills enhance students’ readiness for independent living. A combined approach would ensure students are well-prepared for both academic and practical challenges. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion. Arguments are relevant, but examples are general and lack depth, which prevents a higher score. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is logically organized with clear paragraphing. Linking words like “for example” and “however” are used, but transitions between ideas could be smoother, and some repetition affects cohesion. Lexical Resource: 6.5The vocabulary is appropriate, with phrases like crucial role and promote independence. However, word choices are sometimes repetitive, and more variety could improve the score. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.5The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentences, but minor errors (e.g., article misuse or awkward phrasing) occur. The range of structures is adequate but not diverse enough for Band 7. Phân tích từ vựng Phân tích ngữ pháp Tổng kết & gợi ý cải thiện Tổng kết: Bài viết đạt Band 6.5 nhờ cấu trúc rõ ràng, từ vựng học thuật phù hợp, và lập luận cơ bản. Tuy nhiên, các ý chưa được phát triển sâu, từ vựng hơi lặp lại, và lỗi ngữ pháp nhỏ làm giảm chất lượng. Gợi ý cải thiện để đạt Band 7: Đề 2 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people believe that protecting the environment is the responsibility of individuals, while others argue that governments should take the lead in addressing environmental issues. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) Environmental protection is a pressing concern in today’s world. While some believe individuals should take responsibility for protecting the environment, others argue that governments have a greater role to play. This essay will discuss both perspectives and present my view. On the one hand, individual actions can make a significant impact on the environment. For example, people can reduce waste by recycling or using reusable bags, which helps decrease pollution. Additionally, choosing to walk or cycle instead of driving can lower carbon emissions. These small efforts, when done by many, can lead to substantial change. However, not all individuals are motivated or informed enough to act responsibly. On the other hand, governments have the authority and resources to implement large-scale solutions. For instance, they can enforce laws to limit industrial pollution or invest in renewable energy sources like solar power. Such measures can address environmental challenges more effectively than individual efforts. However, government initiatives may face delays due to bureaucracy or lack of funding. In my opinion, both individuals and governments have important roles, but governments should take the lead. Their ability to introduce systemic changes, such as stricter regulations, can create a bigger impact than individual actions alone. In conclusion, while individual efforts are valuable in promoting environmental sustainability, government-led initiatives are more effective due to their scale and authority. A collaborative approach, combining both, would likely yield the best results. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion. Arguments are relevant but lack depth, with general examples that could be more specific, limiting the score to 6.5. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is well-organized with clear paragraphs. Linking words like “for example” and “however” are used, but transitions are sometimes repetitive, and cohesion could be enhanced with more varied connectors. Lexical Resource: 6.5The vocabulary is appropriate, with phrases like pressing concern and introduce systemic changes. However, some repetition and lack of precision prevent a higher score. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.5The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentences, but minor errors (e.g., article misuse or awkward phrasing) occur. The range of structures is sufficient but not diverse enough for Band 7. Phân tích
IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 42
Trong số bốn kỹ năng được đánh giá, IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 42 thường khiến thí sinh gặp nhiều khó khăn nhất vì đòi hỏi khả năng lập luận logic, diễn đạt mạch lạc và vốn từ học thuật vững chắc. Việc hiểu rõ cấu trúc bài viết, tiêu chí chấm điểm và các dạng đề phổ biến là nền tảng quan trọng giúp người học cải thiện điểm số. Đặc biệt, luyện tập có chiến lược sẽ giúp rút ngắn thời gian và tăng độ chính xác khi viết. Đọc thêm: IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 41. Đề 1 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people believe that international travel has many advantages, while others think it causes more problems than benefits. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) International travel has become increasingly popular in recent years. While some people argue that it brings significant benefits, others believe it creates more problems. This essay will discuss both perspectives and provide my own view. On the one hand, international travel offers numerous advantages. Firstly, it promotes cultural understanding by allowing people to experience different traditions and lifestyles. For example, visiting countries like Japan can teach travelers about unique customs such as tea ceremonies. Secondly, travel boosts the economy of host countries. Tourists spend money on hotels, food, and attractions, which creates jobs. Thus, international travel is considered a valuable opportunity for both individuals and nations. On the other hand, international travel can cause serious issues. One major problem is its environmental impact. Airplanes produce large amounts of carbon emissions, contributing to climate change. Additionally, popular tourist destinations often suffer from overcrowding, which can damage historical sites. For instance, places like Venice struggle with too many visitors, harming the local environment. Therefore, travel can have negative consequences if not managed properly. In my opinion, the benefits of international travel outweigh the drawbacks, provided that sustainable practices are followed. Governments and travelers should work together to reduce environmental damage, such as using eco-friendly transport. In conclusion, while international travel has some negative effects, its advantages in promoting cultural exchange and economic growth make it a worthwhile activity when done responsibly. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, meeting the task requirements. However, the arguments are somewhat general, and examples (e.g., “Japan”) lack depth. To reach Band 7, more specific examples and detailed analysis are needed. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is logically organized with clear paragraphing and basic linking words (e.g., “Firstly,” “Therefore”). Transitions between ideas are occasionally abrupt, and cohesive devices are slightly repetitive. Using varied connectors like “In contrast” or “Consequently” would improve the score. Lexical Resource: 6.5The vocabulary is appropriate, with some academic phrases (e.g., “cultural understanding,” “environmental impact”). Word choice is sometimes repetitive, and more precise or varied terms could elevate the score to Band 7. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.5The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentences with mostly accurate grammar. Minor errors (e.g., “suffer from overcrowding” could be clearer) and limited use of advanced structures prevent a higher score. More varied sentence structures would help. Phân tích từ vựng Phân tích ngữ pháp Tổng kết & gợi ý cải thiện Tổng kết: Bài viết đạt Band 6.5 nhờ cấu trúc rõ ràng, lập luận cơ bản, và từ vựng phù hợp. Tuy nhiên, các ý chưa được phát triển sâu, từ vựng và ngữ pháp thiếu đa dạng, và có một số lỗi nhỏ. (Một số nhận xét mang tính ước lượng vì không thể mô phỏng chính xác chấm điểm như người thật.) Gợi ý cải thiện để đạt Band 7: Đề 2 IELTS Writing Task 2 Many people believe that governments should spend more money on public transportation to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. Others argue that this money should be used for other priorities, such as healthcare or education. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) In recent years, the issue of government spending has been widely debated. Some believe that investing in public transportation is essential to address traffic congestion and pollution, while others argue that funds should prioritize healthcare and education. This essay will discuss both views and present my perspective. On the one hand, improving public transportation has significant benefits. Efficient systems like buses and trains can reduce the number of private cars on roads, leading to less traffic congestion. For example, cities with reliable metro systems, such as Tokyo, experience smoother traffic flow. Additionally, public transport produces fewer emissions than cars, helping to combat environmental pollution. Therefore, this investment is seen as a practical solution to urban problems. On the other hand, some argue that healthcare and education are more urgent priorities. A well-funded healthcare system ensures that citizens have access to quality medical care, which is critical for a healthy population. Similarly, investing in education equips people with skills for better job opportunities. For instance, better schools can improve literacy rates, which benefits society in the long term. Thus, these areas may have a greater impact on people’s lives. In my opinion, while healthcare and education are vital, public transportation deserves more funding because it addresses immediate environmental and traffic issues. A balanced approach, however, could ensure all sectors benefit. In conclusion, although other priorities are important, investing in public transport offers practical solutions to pressing urban challenges. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, fulfilling the task requirements. However, the arguments are somewhat general, and examples (e.g., “Tokyo”) lack detailed explanation. Deeper analysis or more specific examples would help achieve Band 7. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is well-organized with clear paragraphs and linking words (e.g., “For example,” “Therefore”). However, transitions between ideas are sometimes basic, and cohesive devices are slightly repetitive. Using varied connectors like “Conversely” or “As a result” would improve the score. Lexical Resource: 6.5The vocabulary is appropriate for Band
