Trong quá trình chinh phục band điểm cao, kỹ năng lập luận và trình bày quan điểm rõ ràng đóng vai trò then chốt, đặc biệt ở phần IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 44 – nơi thí sinh phải kết hợp tư duy phản biện với cấu trúc bài viết mạch lạc. Thực tế cho thấy, ngay cả những thí sinh đạt band 7.0+ vẫn có thể mất điểm nếu không nắm chắc tiêu chí chấm điểm và cách triển khai luận điểm một cách thuyết phục. Đọc thêm: IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 43. Đề 1 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people believe that technology has made communication easier and more effective. Others argue that it has created barriers to genuine human interaction. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) Technology has transformed the way people communicate, but its impact is debated. Some believe it enhances communication, while others think it hinders genuine interaction. This essay will discuss both perspectives and provide my opinion. On the one hand, supporters of technology argue that it facilitates communication across distances. For example, apps like WhatsApp allow instant messaging and video calls, connecting people globally. This is especially useful for families living apart or businesses working remotely. Additionally, technology streamlines information sharing, as emails and social media enable quick updates. However, over-reliance on devices may reduce face-to-face interaction. On the other hand, critics claim that technology creates barriers to meaningful connection. People often prioritize texting over personal conversations, which can weaken relationships. For instance, many young people spend hours on smartphones, leading to social isolation. Moreover, online communication lacks emotional depth, as tone and body language are absent. However, some argue that technology can still foster closeness if used thoughtfully. In my opinion, technology is a double-edged sword. It enhances connectivity for those far apart, but it can harm relationships if it replaces real-world interaction. People should balance digital and personal communication to maintain genuine connections. In conclusion, while technology makes communication faster and more accessible, it can reduce the quality of human interaction. A balanced approach, combining technology with face-to-face contact, is the best way to ensure effective communication. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, meeting the task requirements. Examples (e.g., WhatsApp, smartphones) are relevant, but some points (e.g., emotional depth) are underdeveloped. To reach Band 7, deeper analysis and more specific evidence are needed. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is well-organized with clear paragraphs and linking words (e.g., “Additionally,” “On the other hand”). However, transitions between ideas are sometimes abrupt, and repetition of “communication” weakens cohesion. Band 7 requires smoother transitions and more varied cohesive devices. Lexical Resource: 6.5Vocabulary is appropriate with some academic phrases (e.g., facilitates communication, barriers to meaningful connection), but there is repetition (e.g., “communication” appears often). Minor word choice issues (e.g., “thoughtfully” is vague) limit the score. Band 7 needs a wider vocabulary range and precise collocations. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.5The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentences (e.g., people often prioritize texting over). Most sentences are accurate, but minor errors (e.g., “can still foster closeness” lacks clarity) and limited complex structures prevent a higher score. Band 7 requires more varied sentence types and fewer errors. Phân tích từ vựng Phân tích ngữ pháp Tổng kết & gợi ý cải thiện Tổng kết: Bài essay đạt Band 6.5 nhờ cấu trúc rõ ràng, từ vựng học thuật phù hợp, và lập luận đáp ứng yêu cầu đề bài. Tuy nhiên, các ý chưa được phát triển sâu, từ vựng lặp lại (e.g., “communication”), và một số lỗi ngữ pháp nhỏ hạn chế điểm số. Gợi ý cải thiện để đạt Band 7: Đề 2 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people believe that the best way to encourage healthy lifestyles is to impose taxes on unhealthy foods. Others argue that education and awareness campaigns are more effective. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) Promoting healthy lifestyles is a growing concern in many countries. Some argue that taxing unhealthy foods is the best approach, while others believe education and awareness campaigns are more effective. This essay will discuss both views and present my opinion. On the one hand, supporters of taxing unhealthy foods claim it can deter unhealthy eating habits. For example, higher prices on sugary drinks in countries like Mexico have reduced their consumption. Taxes also generate revenue, which governments can use to fund health programs. However, this approach may unfairly affect low-income families, who rely on cheaper, less healthy foods. On the other hand, those who favor education argue that it raises awareness about healthy choices. School programs and media campaigns can teach people about nutrition, encouraging them to adopt balanced diets. For instance, campaigns in Australia have increased vegetable consumption among children. Education is also less punitive than taxes and benefits everyone equally. However, its impact may be slow, as changing habits takes time. In my opinion, education is more effective than taxes. While taxes may reduce consumption, they do not address the root causes of unhealthy eating, such as lack of knowledge. Awareness campaigns can inspire long-term change by empowering individuals to make better choices. In conclusion, taxing unhealthy foods can discourage poor dietary habits, but education and awareness campaigns are more sustainable. Focusing on knowledge and empowerment is the best way to promote healthy lifestyles. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, meeting the task requirements. Examples (e.g., Mexico, Australia) are relevant, but some points (e.g., impact on low-income families) are underdeveloped. To reach Band 7, deeper analysis and more specific evidence are needed. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is logically organized with clear paragraphs and linking words (e.g., “For example,” “On the other hand”). However, transitions between ideas could be smoother, and repetition of “healthy” weakens cohesion. Band 7 requires more varied cohesive devices and seamless

Trong số bốn kỹ năng được đánh giá, IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 42 thường khiến thí sinh gặp nhiều khó khăn nhất vì đòi hỏi khả năng lập luận logic, diễn đạt mạch lạc và vốn từ học thuật vững chắc. Việc hiểu rõ cấu trúc bài viết, tiêu chí chấm điểm và các dạng đề phổ biến là nền tảng quan trọng giúp người học cải thiện điểm số. Đặc biệt, luyện tập có chiến lược sẽ giúp rút ngắn thời gian và tăng độ chính xác khi viết. Đọc thêm: IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 41. Đề 1 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people believe that international travel has many advantages, while others think it causes more problems than benefits. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) International travel has become increasingly popular in recent years. While some people argue that it brings significant benefits, others believe it creates more problems. This essay will discuss both perspectives and provide my own view. On the one hand, international travel offers numerous advantages. Firstly, it promotes cultural understanding by allowing people to experience different traditions and lifestyles. For example, visiting countries like Japan can teach travelers about unique customs such as tea ceremonies. Secondly, travel boosts the economy of host countries. Tourists spend money on hotels, food, and attractions, which creates jobs. Thus, international travel is considered a valuable opportunity for both individuals and nations. On the other hand, international travel can cause serious issues. One major problem is its environmental impact. Airplanes produce large amounts of carbon emissions, contributing to climate change. Additionally, popular tourist destinations often suffer from overcrowding, which can damage historical sites. For instance, places like Venice struggle with too many visitors, harming the local environment. Therefore, travel can have negative consequences if not managed properly. In my opinion, the benefits of international travel outweigh the drawbacks, provided that sustainable practices are followed. Governments and travelers should work together to reduce environmental damage, such as using eco-friendly transport. In conclusion, while international travel has some negative effects, its advantages in promoting cultural exchange and economic growth make it a worthwhile activity when done responsibly. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, meeting the task requirements. However, the arguments are somewhat general, and examples (e.g., “Japan”) lack depth. To reach Band 7, more specific examples and detailed analysis are needed. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is logically organized with clear paragraphing and basic linking words (e.g., “Firstly,” “Therefore”). Transitions between ideas are occasionally abrupt, and cohesive devices are slightly repetitive. Using varied connectors like “In contrast” or “Consequently” would improve the score. Lexical Resource: 6.5The vocabulary is appropriate, with some academic phrases (e.g., “cultural understanding,” “environmental impact”). Word choice is sometimes repetitive, and more precise or varied terms could elevate the score to Band 7. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.5The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentences with mostly accurate grammar. Minor errors (e.g., “suffer from overcrowding” could be clearer) and limited use of advanced structures prevent a higher score. More varied sentence structures would help. Phân tích từ vựng Phân tích ngữ pháp Tổng kết & gợi ý cải thiện Tổng kết: Bài viết đạt Band 6.5 nhờ cấu trúc rõ ràng, lập luận cơ bản, và từ vựng phù hợp. Tuy nhiên, các ý chưa được phát triển sâu, từ vựng và ngữ pháp thiếu đa dạng, và có một số lỗi nhỏ. (Một số nhận xét mang tính ước lượng vì không thể mô phỏng chính xác chấm điểm như người thật.) Gợi ý cải thiện để đạt Band 7: Đề 2 IELTS Writing Task 2 Many people believe that governments should spend more money on public transportation to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. Others argue that this money should be used for other priorities, such as healthcare or education. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) In recent years, the issue of government spending has been widely debated. Some believe that investing in public transportation is essential to address traffic congestion and pollution, while others argue that funds should prioritize healthcare and education. This essay will discuss both views and present my perspective. On the one hand, improving public transportation has significant benefits. Efficient systems like buses and trains can reduce the number of private cars on roads, leading to less traffic congestion. For example, cities with reliable metro systems, such as Tokyo, experience smoother traffic flow. Additionally, public transport produces fewer emissions than cars, helping to combat environmental pollution. Therefore, this investment is seen as a practical solution to urban problems. On the other hand, some argue that healthcare and education are more urgent priorities. A well-funded healthcare system ensures that citizens have access to quality medical care, which is critical for a healthy population. Similarly, investing in education equips people with skills for better job opportunities. For instance, better schools can improve literacy rates, which benefits society in the long term. Thus, these areas may have a greater impact on people’s lives. In my opinion, while healthcare and education are vital, public transportation deserves more funding because it addresses immediate environmental and traffic issues. A balanced approach, however, could ensure all sectors benefit. In conclusion, although other priorities are important, investing in public transport offers practical solutions to pressing urban challenges. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, fulfilling the task requirements. However, the arguments are somewhat general, and examples (e.g., “Tokyo”) lack detailed explanation. Deeper analysis or more specific examples would help achieve Band 7. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is well-organized with clear paragraphs and linking words (e.g., “For example,” “Therefore”). However, transitions between ideas are sometimes basic, and cohesive devices are slightly repetitive. Using varied connectors like “Conversely” or “As a result” would improve the score. Lexical Resource: 6.5The vocabulary is appropriate for Band

Kỹ năng lập luận và tư duy phản biện ngày càng đóng vai trò then chốt trong việc đạt điểm cao ở IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 43. Đây không chỉ là phần thi đòi hỏi vốn từ vựng học thuật và cấu trúc ngữ pháp chuẩn xác, mà còn yêu cầu thí sinh trình bày quan điểm một cách logic, mạch lạc. Việc hiểu rõ tiêu chí chấm điểm cùng các dạng đề thường gặp là bước đầu tiên để cải thiện hiệu quả kỹ năng viết trong kỳ thi này. Đọc thêm: IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 42. Đề 1 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people believe that children should be taught practical life skills, such as cooking or financial management, at school. Others argue that schools should focus on academic subjects to prepare students for higher education. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) Education plays a crucial role in preparing young people for the future. Some argue that schools should teach practical life skills like cooking or financial management, while others believe that academic subjects are more important for university preparation. This essay will discuss both perspectives and provide my opinion. On the one hand, teaching life skills at school can equip students with essential abilities. For example, learning to cook helps students maintain a healthy diet, while financial management teaches them how to budget and save. These skills are useful in daily life and can promote independence, especially for students who move away from home. However, adding these subjects might reduce time for academic learning, which could affect exam results. On the other hand, focusing on academic subjects prepares students for higher education. Subjects like math, science, and literature develop critical thinking and knowledge needed for university courses. For instance, strong academic performance can open doors to better opportunities, such as scholarships. However, this approach may leave students unprepared for practical challenges, like managing household tasks. In my opinion, schools should balance both approaches. While academic subjects are vital for intellectual growth, practical skills are equally important for personal development. A curriculum that includes both would best serve students’ needs. In conclusion, although academic subjects are essential for university preparation, practical life skills enhance students’ readiness for independent living. A combined approach would ensure students are well-prepared for both academic and practical challenges. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion. Arguments are relevant, but examples are general and lack depth, which prevents a higher score. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is logically organized with clear paragraphing. Linking words like “for example” and “however” are used, but transitions between ideas could be smoother, and some repetition affects cohesion. Lexical Resource: 6.5The vocabulary is appropriate, with phrases like crucial role and promote independence. However, word choices are sometimes repetitive, and more variety could improve the score. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.5The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentences, but minor errors (e.g., article misuse or awkward phrasing) occur. The range of structures is adequate but not diverse enough for Band 7. Phân tích từ vựng Phân tích ngữ pháp Tổng kết & gợi ý cải thiện Tổng kết: Bài viết đạt Band 6.5 nhờ cấu trúc rõ ràng, từ vựng học thuật phù hợp, và lập luận cơ bản. Tuy nhiên, các ý chưa được phát triển sâu, từ vựng hơi lặp lại, và lỗi ngữ pháp nhỏ làm giảm chất lượng. Gợi ý cải thiện để đạt Band 7: Đề 2 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people believe that protecting the environment is the responsibility of individuals, while others argue that governments should take the lead in addressing environmental issues. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) Environmental protection is a pressing concern in today’s world. While some believe individuals should take responsibility for protecting the environment, others argue that governments have a greater role to play. This essay will discuss both perspectives and present my view. On the one hand, individual actions can make a significant impact on the environment. For example, people can reduce waste by recycling or using reusable bags, which helps decrease pollution. Additionally, choosing to walk or cycle instead of driving can lower carbon emissions. These small efforts, when done by many, can lead to substantial change. However, not all individuals are motivated or informed enough to act responsibly. On the other hand, governments have the authority and resources to implement large-scale solutions. For instance, they can enforce laws to limit industrial pollution or invest in renewable energy sources like solar power. Such measures can address environmental challenges more effectively than individual efforts. However, government initiatives may face delays due to bureaucracy or lack of funding. In my opinion, both individuals and governments have important roles, but governments should take the lead. Their ability to introduce systemic changes, such as stricter regulations, can create a bigger impact than individual actions alone. In conclusion, while individual efforts are valuable in promoting environmental sustainability, government-led initiatives are more effective due to their scale and authority. A collaborative approach, combining both, would likely yield the best results. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion. Arguments are relevant but lack depth, with general examples that could be more specific, limiting the score to 6.5. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is well-organized with clear paragraphs. Linking words like “for example” and “however” are used, but transitions are sometimes repetitive, and cohesion could be enhanced with more varied connectors. Lexical Resource: 6.5The vocabulary is appropriate, with phrases like pressing concern and introduce systemic changes. However, some repetition and lack of precision prevent a higher score. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.5The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentences, but minor errors (e.g., article misuse or awkward phrasing) occur. The range of structures is sufficient but not diverse enough for Band 7. Phân tích

Trong các kỹ năng được đánh giá trong kỳ thi IELTS, kỹ năng viết luôn là thách thức lớn với nhiều thí sinh, đặc biệt là ở phần IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 41, nơi yêu cầu khả năng lập luận logic, tư duy phản biện và sử dụng ngôn ngữ học thuật chính xác. Việc nắm vững cấu trúc bài viết, kết hợp chiến lược triển khai ý hiệu quả không chỉ giúp nâng cao điểm số mà còn phản ánh năng lực sử dụng tiếng Anh trong môi trường học thuật và chuyên nghiệp. Đọc thêm: IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 40. Đề 1 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people believe that the development of artificial intelligence (AI) will bring more benefits to society, while others argue that it poses significant risks. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has sparked debate about its impact on society. Some believe AI offers substantial benefits, while others warn of its potential dangers. This essay will discuss both perspectives and provide my own view. On the one hand, AI brings numerous advantages to society. Firstly, it improves efficiency in various sectors. For example, AI-powered systems in healthcare can diagnose diseases faster than humans, saving lives. Secondly, AI enhances convenience in daily life. Virtual assistants like Siri help people manage tasks efficiently. Therefore, AI is considered a transformative technology that can improve living standards. On the other hand, AI poses serious risks. One major concern is job displacement. Automation may replace workers in industries like manufacturing, leading to unemployment. Additionally, AI systems could be misused, such as in creating deepfake videos, which can spread misinformation. Thus, the development of AI may have negative consequences if not regulated properly. In my opinion, the benefits of AI outweigh the risks, provided there are strict regulations. Governments should ensure AI is used ethically to minimize harm, such as protecting jobs and preventing misuse. In conclusion, while AI has potential dangers, its advantages in improving efficiency and convenience make it a valuable tool for society when managed responsibly. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, meeting the task requirements. However, arguments are somewhat general, and examples (e.g., “Siri”) lack detailed development. To reach Band 7, more specific examples and deeper analysis are needed. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is logically organized with clear paragraphs and linking words (e.g., “Firstly,” “Therefore”). Transitions are sometimes basic, and cohesive devices are slightly repetitive. Using varied connectors like “In contrast” or “Consequently” would improve the score. Lexical Resource: 6.5The vocabulary is appropriate, with some academic phrases (e.g., “numerous advantages,” “transformative technology”). Word choice is occasionally repetitive, and more precise or varied terms could elevate the score to Band 7. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.5The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentences with mostly accurate grammar. Minor errors (e.g., “may have negative consequences” could be clearer) and limited use of advanced structures prevent a higher score. More diverse sentence types would enhance the score. Phân tích từ vựng Phân tích ngữ pháp Tổng kết & gợi ý cải thiện Tổng kết: Bài viết đạt Band 6.5 nhờ cấu trúc rõ ràng, lập luận cơ bản, và từ vựng phù hợp. Tuy nhiên, các ý chưa được phát triển sâu, từ vựng và ngữ pháp thiếu đa dạng, và có một số lỗi nhỏ. (Một số nhận xét mang tính ước lượng vì không thể mô phỏng chính xác chấm điểm như người thật.) Gợi ý cải thiện để đạt Band 7: Đề 2 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people believe that working from home is more beneficial for employees and employers, while others think it reduces productivity and social interaction. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) In recent years, working from home has gained popularity due to technological advancements. Some argue that it benefits both employees and employers, while others believe it harms productivity and social connections. This essay will discuss both perspectives and present my own view. On the one hand, working from home offers significant advantages. Firstly, it provides employees with greater flexibility in managing their schedules, which can improve work-life balance. For example, workers can avoid long commutes, saving time and money. Secondly, employers benefit from reduced costs, as they need less office space and utilities. Therefore, remote work is seen as a practical solution for modern workplaces. On the other hand, working from home has notable drawbacks. One major issue is that it may lower productivity. Without direct supervision, some employees might procrastinate or become distracted by household tasks. Additionally, remote work can limit social interaction, as workers miss out on face-to-face collaboration with colleagues. For instance, team brainstorming sessions are often less effective online. Thus, working from home can negatively affect workplace dynamics. In my opinion, the benefits of working from home outweigh the disadvantages if managed properly. Employers should provide clear guidelines to maintain productivity, and employees can schedule virtual meetings to stay connected. In conclusion, while working from home has some challenges, its advantages in flexibility and cost savings make it a valuable option for both employees and employers. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, fulfilling the task requirements. However, arguments are somewhat general, and examples (e.g., “long commutes”) lack depth. To reach Band 7, more specific examples and detailed analysis are needed. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is logically organized with clear paragraphs and basic linking words (e.g., “Firstly,” “Therefore”). Transitions are occasionally abrupt, and cohesive devices are slightly repetitive. Using varied connectors like “Conversely” or “As a result” would improve the score. Lexical Resource: 6.5The vocabulary is appropriate, with some academic phrases (e.g., “significant advantages,” “reduced costs”). Word choice is sometimes repetitive, and more precise or varied terms could elevate the score to Band 7. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.5The

Trong số bốn kỹ năng được đánh giá trong kỳ thi IELTS, viết luôn là phần khiến nhiều thí sinh cảm thấy áp lực nhất, đặc biệt là ở IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 40 – nơi đòi hỏi khả năng lập luận mạch lạc, từ vựng học thuật và tư duy phản biện rõ ràng. Việc hiểu rõ yêu cầu đề bài, kết cấu bài luận và tiêu chí chấm điểm sẽ giúp người học tối ưu hóa điểm số, đặc biệt trong giai đoạn ôn luyện trung và nâng cao. Đọc thêm: IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 39 phần 2. Đề 1 IELTS Writing Task 2 Many people believe that social media has a negative impact on mental health. Others, however, argue that it can have positive effects. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) Social media has become an essential part of modern life, but its effects on mental health are widely debated. Some argue that it harms mental well-being, while others believe it brings positive benefits. This essay will discuss both perspectives and explain why I think social media’s impact depends on how it is used. On the one hand, critics of social media claim that it can trigger anxiety and depression. Spending excessive time online, especially comparing oneself to others, often leads to feelings of inadequacy. For example, young people may feel pressured by perfect images on platforms like Instagram. Moreover, cyberbullying on social media can severely affect victims’ mental health, causing stress or even trauma. On the other hand, supporters argue that social media can foster a sense of community. It allows people to connect with friends, family, or even strangers who share similar interests, reducing loneliness. For instance, online support groups help individuals with mental health issues share their experiences. Additionally, social media provides access to valuable resources, such as educational content or mental health tips, which can improve well-being. In my opinion, social media is neither entirely harmful nor completely beneficial. Its impact depends on responsible usage, such as limiting screen time and avoiding toxic content. In conclusion, while social media can harm mental health if misused, it can also be a positive tool when used wisely. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, fulfilling the task. However, the arguments are somewhat general, with examples like “perfect images on Instagram” lacking specificity. The conclusion is clear but does not add new insights, limiting the score to 6.5. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is logically organized with clear paragraphs. Linking words like “for example” and “moreover” are used appropriately, but transitions between ideas (e.g., from cyberbullying to community) are slightly mechanical. Some repetition of ideas reduces cohesion. Lexical Resource: 6.5The vocabulary is suitable for Band 6.5, with academic phrases like foster a sense of community and trigger anxiety. However, there is some repetition (e.g., “mental health” appears frequently), and the absence of higher-level synonyms or collocations prevents a Band 7 score. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.5The essay uses a variety of sentence structures with generally accurate grammar. Minor errors, such as “severely affect” (slightly awkward collocation), and limited use of advanced structures (e.g., conditional or passive forms) keep the score at 6.5. Phân tích từ vựng Phân tích ngữ pháp Tổng kết & gợi ý cải thiện Tổng kết: Bài viết đạt Band 6.5 nhờ cấu trúc rõ ràng, từ vựng phù hợp, và lập luận cơ bản. Tuy nhiên, các lỗi nhỏ trong từ vựng (lặp từ, cụm chưa tối ưu), ngữ pháp (thiếu cấu trúc phức tạp), và ví dụ chung chung khiến bài chưa đạt Band 7. (Nhận xét này dựa trên tiêu chí Cambridge, nhưng một số yếu tố như mức độ thuyết phục có thể phụ thuộc vào giám khảo.) Gợi ý cải thiện để đạt Band 7: Đề 2 IELTS Writing Task 2 Many people believe that social media has a negative impact on mental health. Others, however, argue that it can have positive effects on well-being. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) Social media is widely used today, but its impact on mental health is a topic of debate. Some people claim it has negative effects, while others believe it can benefit well-being. This essay will discuss both perspectives and provide my opinion. On the one hand, critics argue that social media harms mental health. Spending too much time online can lead to feelings of isolation, as people compare their lives to others’ perfect images on platforms like Instagram. For example, studies show that excessive use of social media is linked to anxiety and depression among teenagers. Moreover, constant notifications can disrupt concentration, making it harder to focus on work or studies. However, not all users experience these issues, and some manage their time well. On the other hand, supporters highlight the positive aspects of social media. It allows people to stay connected with friends and family, especially those far away. For instance, platforms like Facebook help users share updates and maintain relationships. Additionally, social media can raise awareness about mental health issues, encouraging people to seek help. Online communities also provide support for those feeling lonely. However, these benefits depend on how people use the platforms. In my opinion, social media has both positive and negative effects, but the key is moderation. Users should limit their time online to avoid mental health challenges. A balanced approach can maximize the benefits while minimizing harm. In conclusion, social media can harm mental health by causing isolation and distraction, but it also fosters connection and awareness. Using it wisely is the best solution. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, meeting the task requirements. Examples (e.g., Instagram, Facebook) are relevant, but some points, like the link to anxiety, are underdeveloped. To reach Band 7, deeper analysis and more specific evidence are needed. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The

Kỹ năng viết đóng vai trò quan trọng không chỉ ở mặt điểm số mà còn thể hiện rõ khả năng lập luận và diễn đạt học thuật của thí sinh. Đặc biệt, IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 39 thường yêu cầu người học xử lý các chủ đề xã hội quen thuộc dưới góc nhìn phản biện. Việc nắm vững cấu trúc bài luận, biết cách triển khai luận điểm mạch lạc và sử dụng ngôn ngữ phù hợp là yếu tố then chốt để đạt band điểm cao. Đọc thêm: IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 39. Đề 1 IELTS Writing Task 2 Many people believe that governments should spend more money on public transportation to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. Others argue that this money should be used for other priorities, such as healthcare or education. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) In recent years, the issue of government spending has been widely debated. Some believe that investing in public transportation is essential to address traffic congestion and pollution, while others argue that funds should prioritize healthcare and education. This essay will discuss both views and present my perspective. On the one hand, improving public transportation has significant benefits. Efficient systems like buses and trains can reduce the number of private cars on roads, leading to less traffic congestion. For example, cities with reliable metro systems, such as Tokyo, experience smoother traffic flow. Additionally, public transport produces fewer emissions than cars, helping to combat environmental pollution. Therefore, this investment is seen as a practical solution to urban problems. On the other hand, some argue that healthcare and education are more urgent priorities. A well-funded healthcare system ensures that citizens have access to quality medical care, which is critical for a healthy population. Similarly, investing in education equips people with skills for better job opportunities. For instance, better schools can improve literacy rates, which benefits society in the long term. Thus, these areas may have a greater impact on people’s lives. In my opinion, while healthcare and education are vital, public transportation deserves more funding because it addresses immediate environmental and traffic issues. A balanced approach, however, could ensure all sectors benefit. In conclusion, although other priorities are important, investing in public transport offers practical solutions to pressing urban challenges. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, fulfilling the task requirements. However, the arguments are somewhat general, and examples (e.g., “Tokyo”) lack detailed explanation. Deeper analysis or more specific examples would help achieve Band 7. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is well-organized with clear paragraphs and linking words (e.g., “For example,” “Therefore”). However, transitions between ideas are sometimes basic, and cohesive devices are slightly repetitive. Using varied connectors like “Conversely” or “As a result” would improve the score. Lexical Resource: 6.5The vocabulary is appropriate for Band 6.5, with some academic phrases (e.g., “significant benefits,” “combat environmental pollution”). Word choice is occasionally repetitive, and more precise or varied terms could push the score to Band 7. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.5The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentences with generally accurate grammar. Minor errors (e.g., “deserves more funding” could be clearer) and limited use of advanced structures prevent a higher score. More diverse sentence types would enhance the score. Phân tích từ vựng Phân tích ngữ pháp Tổng kết & gợi ý cải thiện Tổng kết: Bài viết đạt Band 6.5 nhờ cấu trúc rõ ràng, lập luận cơ bản, và từ vựng phù hợp. Tuy nhiên, các ý chưa được phát triển sâu, từ vựng và ngữ pháp thiếu đa dạng, và có một số lỗi nhỏ. (Một số nhận xét mang tính ước lượng vì không thể mô phỏng chính xác chấm điểm như người thật.) Gợi ý cải thiện để đạt Band 7: Đề 2 IELTS Writing Task 2 In some countries, the government spends a large amount of money on arts and cultural activities, such as museums and theaters. Some people believe this is a waste of money and that the funds should be used for more practical issues like healthcare and education. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) In many countries, government spending on arts and cultural activities is a topic of debate. Some argue that this is a misuse of public funds, while others believe it is important for society. This essay will discuss both perspectives and present my own view. On the one hand, critics of funding the arts argue that the money should be allocated to pressing issues like healthcare and education. These sectors directly impact people’s lives by improving their well-being and opportunities. For instance, better hospitals can save lives, and quality education can equip individuals with skills for employment. When budgets are limited, prioritizing practical needs seems reasonable, as arts may appear less essential. This view is particularly strong in poorer countries where basic services are lacking. On the other hand, supporters of arts funding believe it has significant benefits. Museums and theaters preserve cultural heritage, which strengthens national identity and pride. Additionally, cultural activities can boost tourism, generating income for local communities. For example, a well-maintained museum can attract visitors, creating jobs. Moreover, the arts can inspire creativity, which is valuable for personal and societal development. Therefore, investing in culture is not just about enjoyment but also about long-term gains. In my opinion, both sides have merit, but a balanced approach is best. Governments should prioritize essential services like healthcare and education but also allocate some funds to the arts to enrich society. This ensures practical needs are met while maintaining cultural values. In conclusion, while healthcare and education are critical, arts funding has its own importance. A combination of both is the most effective solution. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion. Ideas are relevant but lack deeper exploration (e.g., specific examples of