Chủ đề Art là chủ để Writing được nhiều giám khảo và thầy cô giáo chú ý cho luyện thi IELTS. Nên TRI biên soạn chủ đề này để các bạn có thể tham khảo.
Writing Urban Beautification
Urban Beautification: Many argue that municipal funds should be allocated towards the installation of public artworks such as sculptures and murals to enhance the aesthetic appeal of cities. To what extent do you agree?
Từ vựng
- Urban Beautification: Sự làm đẹp đô thị.
- Municipal funds: Ngân sách của thành phố.
- Public artworks: Các tác phẩm nghệ thuật công cộng.
- Sculptures: Tượng điêu khắc.
- Murals: Tranh tường.
- Aesthetic appeal: Sức hấp dẫn về mặt thẩm mỹ.
- Tourism: Du lịch.
- Economic growth: Sự phát triển kinh tế.
- Cultural hubs: Trung tâm văn hóa.
- Community pride: Niềm tự hào cộng đồng.
- Cultural identity: Bản sắc văn hóa.
- Heritage: Di sản.
- Mental health: Sức khỏe tinh thần.
- Well-being: Sự an lạc, hạnh phúc.
- Planning: Lập kế hoạch.
- Community consultation: Tư vấn cộng đồng.
- Resonate: Gây ấn tượng, làm ấn tượng mạnh mẽ.
- Resistance: Sự phản đối, chống lại.
Cấu trúc câu và ngữ pháp
- Động từ + danh từ: Ví dụ: “Investing in urban beautification can stimulate tourism and economic growth.”
- Danh từ + động từ: Ví dụ: “Tourism stimulate economic growth.”
- Danh từ + động từ + giới từ: Ví dụ: “Public artworks promote cultural identity and community pride.”
- Danh từ + động từ + tân ngữ + giới từ: Ví dụ: “Urban beautification projects should ideally be part of a broader strategy that addresses both the immediate needs of the community and the long-term goals of creating inclusive, vibrant, and sustainable urban environments.”
- Danh từ + động từ + tân ngữ: Ví dụ: “Beautifying urban spaces with public artworks can contribute to the mental health and well-being of city dwellers.”
- Danh từ + động từ + tân ngữ + trạng từ: Ví dụ: “Public artworks enhance the aesthetic appeal of cities, making them more attractive to residents and visitors alike.”
Dàn ý bài viết
In this case, I’ll present arguments both in favor of and against allocating municipal funds towards urban beautification, focusing on the installation of public artworks like sculptures and murals.
| Agree | Disagree |
|---|---|
| 1. Public artworks enhance the aesthetic appeal of cities, making them more attractive to residents and visitors alike. | 1. Municipal funds should prioritize essential services like infrastructure, education, and healthcare over non-essential beautification projects. |
| 2. Investing in urban beautification can stimulate tourism and economic growth by creating vibrant cultural hubs that attract businesses and visitors. | 2. There may be more pressing issues within a city, such as poverty, homelessness, and crime, that require immediate attention and funding. |
| 3. Public artworks promote cultural identity and community pride, fostering a sense of belonging among residents and celebrating local heritage. | 3. Allocating funds for urban beautification may be seen as frivolous spending by some taxpayers, especially if they do not directly benefit from these projects. |
| 4. Beautifying urban spaces with public artworks can contribute to the mental health and well-being of city dwellers by creating uplifting and inspiring environments. | 4. Without proper planning and community consultation, public artworks may not resonate with local residents or may even be met with resistance. |
Conclusion: While the installation of public artworks can undoubtedly enhance the aesthetic appeal of cities and contribute to their cultural and economic vitality, it’s essential to consider the opportunity cost and prioritize the allocation of municipal funds wisely. Urban beautification projects should ideally be part of a broader strategy that addresses both the immediate needs of the community and the long-term goals of creating inclusive, vibrant, and sustainable urban environments.
Đọc lại bài cũ: Writing IELTS theo chủ đề Animal part 2.
Civic Enhancement:
Civic Enhancement: There is a school of thought advocating for increased government expenditure on public art installations, such as sculptures and street art, to enrich the urban environment. To what extent do you agree?
Từ vựng và cụm từ vựng:
- Agree (Đồng ý):
- Public art installations: Các cài đặt nghệ thuật công cộng
- Enhance the aesthetic appeal: Tăng cường sức hấp dẫn mỹ thuật
- Urban landscapes: Cảnh quan đô thị
- Cultural landmarks: Điểm địa lý văn hóa
- Tourist attractions: Điểm thu hút du khách
- Foster a sense of community: Nuôi dưỡng tinh thần cộng đồng
- Civic pride: Niềm tự hào dân chủ
- Showcase their talent: Trình diễn tài năng của họ
- Social engagement: Sự tham gia xã hội
- Disagree (Không đồng ý):
- Essential services: Dịch vụ thiết yếu
- Allocation of funds: Phân bổ nguồn lực
- Socio-economic issues: Vấn đề xã hội kinh tế
- Art preferences vary: Sở thích nghệ thuật khác nhau
- Maintenance costs: Chi phí bảo trì
- Infrastructure needs: Nhu cầu cơ sở hạ tầng
- Infrastructure neglect: Sự sao lãng cơ sở hạ tầng
Cấu trúc câu và cấu trúc ngữ pháp:
- Cấu trúc câu:
- Câu chủ đề: “There is a school of thought advocating for…”
- Câu mệnh lệnh: “To what extent do you agree or disagree?”
- Câu diễn đạt quan điểm: “While increased government expenditure on…”
- Câu nêu ý kiến: “While increased government expenditure on public art installations can indeed…”
- Cấu trúc ngữ pháp:
- Câu phức: “Increased government expenditure on public art installations can indeed enrich the urban environment by enhancing aesthetics…”
- Danh từ và động từ: “Public art installations enhance the aesthetic appeal…”
- Mệnh đề quan hệ: “Some may argue that art preferences vary…”
- Mệnh đề điều kiện: “Prioritizing public art over other infrastructure needs could lead to infrastructure neglect.”
Dàn ý bài viết
| Agree | Disagree |
|---|---|
| Public art installations enhance the aesthetic appeal of urban landscapes | Increased government expenditure on public art may divert funds from essential services |
| They serve as cultural landmarks and tourist attractions | Allocation of funds to public art may not be a priority in areas with pressing socio-economic issues |
| Public art fosters a sense of community and civic pride | Some may argue that art preferences vary, and not all citizens may appreciate certain installations |
| It provides opportunities for local artists to showcase their talent | Maintenance costs of public art installations can be significant and burdensome |
| Public art installations can promote social engagement and interaction | Prioritizing public art over other infrastructure needs could lead to infrastructure neglect |
Conclusion: While increased government expenditure on public art installations can indeed enrich the urban environment by enhancing aesthetics, fostering community engagement, and showcasing local talent, there are valid concerns regarding budget allocation, maintenance costs, and the prioritization of essential services. Striking a balance between investing in public art and addressing pressing socio-economic needs is crucial for effective civic enhancement.
(Còn tiếp)
