Đây là phần 4 của dạng Extremely Hard Question. Cho dù bạn có định ôn tập Writing bất cứ chủ đề nào đi chăng nữa, vẫn sẽ có những kỳ thi có những câu hỏi nằm ngoài chủ đề đã ôn tập. Bây giờ bạn nên làm thế nào? Nếu như bạn học theo lộ trình cá nhân hóa tại TRI thì bạn chắc chắn sẽ giải quyết được vấn đề này. Còn nếu bạn chưa muốn học thì bạn cứ làm theo các dạng bài tập mà TRI biên soạn sau đây.
Writing Task part 5
Is it realistic to expect a smooth transition from separate national governments to a single global authority? Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Answer
| Agree | Disagree |
|---|---|
| A single global authority can streamline decision-making processes, leading to more efficient governance and faster responses to global challenges. | Establishing a single global authority could undermine cultural diversity and local autonomy, potentially leading to the suppression of minority voices and perspectives. |
| A unified global authority could facilitate coordinated efforts to address pressing global issues such as climate change, terrorism, and pandemics, ensuring a more effective response than fragmented national efforts. | Consolidating power in a single global authority could lead to corruption, abuse of power, and lack of accountability, as it becomes increasingly difficult for citizens to hold such a distant and centralized authority to account. |
| Transitioning to a single global authority could reduce conflicts and wars between nations, as disputes would be resolved through diplomatic channels rather than military confrontation. | Implementing a single global authority would face significant resistance from entrenched national interests, resulting in prolonged political conflicts and potentially violent opposition to the loss of national sovereignty. |
| A global authority could enforce international law more effectively, promoting justice and equality on a global scale by holding individuals and nations accountable for their actions. | Centralizing power in a single global authority could exacerbate inequality, as powerful nations or groups may dominate decision-making processes, leaving marginalized communities and smaller nations without a voice in global affairs. |
Summary: Transitioning from separate national governments to a single global authority presents both advantages and disadvantages. While it could lead to more efficient governance, faster responses to global challenges, and reduced conflicts between nations, it also raises concerns about cultural diversity, local autonomy, corruption, abuse of power, and inequality. Achieving a smooth transition would require addressing these challenges while ensuring transparency, accountability, and inclusivity in global decision-making processes.
Vocabulary
- Transitioning: Chuyển đổi, chuyển giao.
- Single global authority: Cơ quan toàn cầu duy nhất.
- Streamline: Tối ưu hóa.
- Decision-making processes: Quy trình ra quyết định.
- Efficient governance: Quản trị hiệu quả.
- Faster responses: Phản ứng nhanh hơn.
- Global challenges: Thách thức toàn cầu.
- Fragmented: Phân mảnh, tách rời.
- Undermine: Làm suy yếu.
- Cultural diversity: Đa dạng văn hóa.
- Local autonomy: Tự trị địa phương.
- Suppression: Đàn áp.
- Minority voices: Tiếng nói của các cộng đồng thiểu số.
- Perspectives: Quan điểm.
- Facilitate: Tiện lợi, thuận lợi.
- Coordinated efforts: Nỗ lực phối hợp.
- Address: Đối phó với, giải quyết.
- Pressing: Khẩn cấp.
- Terrorism: Khủng bố.
- Pandemics: Đại dịch.
- Fragmented national efforts: Các nỗ lực quốc gia bị tách rời.
- Consolidating power: Tích hợp quyền lực.
- Corruption: Tham nhũng.
- Abuse of power: Lạm dụng quyền lực.
- Accountability: Trách nhiệm.
- Entrenched national interests: Lợi ích quốc gia bám đắm.
- Prolonged: Kéo dài.
- Political conflicts: Xung đột chính trị.
- Violent opposition: Phản đối bạo lực.
- Sovereignty: Chủ quyền.
- Enforce: Thực thi.
- International law: Luật quốc tế.
- Justice and equality: Công bằng và bình đẳng.
- Hold individuals and nations accountable: Chịu trách nhiệm cá nhân và quốc gia.
- Exacerbate: Làm trầm trọng thêm.
- Marginalized communities: Các cộng đồng bị xã hội đẩy lùi.
- Decision-making processes: Quy trình ra quyết định.
- Inclusivity: Sự bao hàm, tính toàn dân.
Grammar
Cấu trúc câu và cấu trúc ngữ pháp:
- Câu đặc điểm chung:
- Ví dụ: “Transitioning from separate national governments to a single global authority presents both advantages and disadvantages.”
- So sánh và phản biện:
- Ví dụ: “While it could lead to more efficient governance, faster responses to global challenges, and reduced conflicts between nations, it also raises concerns about cultural diversity, local autonomy, corruption, abuse of power, and inequality.”
- Phân tích lợi ích và bất lợi:
- Ví dụ: “Achieving a smooth transition would require addressing these challenges while ensuring transparency, accountability, and inclusivity in global decision-making processes.”
- Diễn đạt quan điểm:
- Ví dụ: “Establishing a single global authority could undermine cultural diversity and local autonomy, potentially leading to the suppression of minority voices and perspectives.”
- Mô tả hậu quả:
- Ví dụ: “Implementing a single global authority would face significant resistance from entrenched national interests, resulting in prolonged political conflicts and potentially violent opposition to the loss of national sovereignty.”
- Đề cập đến giải pháp:
- Ví dụ: “Transitioning to a single global authority could reduce conflicts and wars between nations, as disputes would be resolved through diplomatic channels rather than military confrontation.”
Bài viết gợi ý hoàn chỉnh cho chủ đề Extremely Hard Question
The Pros and Cons of Transitioning to a Single Global Authority
Transitioning from separate national governments to a single global authority is a complex endeavor that presents both advantages and disadvantages. While some argue that such a transition could streamline decision-making processes and lead to more efficient governance, others raise concerns about the potential suppression of cultural diversity and local autonomy. In this essay, we will examine both perspectives and evaluate the implications of establishing a single global authority.
On the one hand, proponents of a single global authority argue that it could facilitate coordinated efforts to address pressing global issues. They contend that a unified approach would ensure a more effective response to challenges such as climate change, terrorism, and pandemics. By consolidating power at the global level, it is believed that conflicts and wars between nations could be reduced, as disputes would be resolved through diplomatic channels rather than military confrontation. Additionally, a global authority could enforce international law more effectively, promoting justice and equality on a global scale by holding individuals and nations accountable for their actions.
On the other hand, opponents raise valid concerns about the potential drawbacks of transitioning to a single global authority. They argue that such a consolidation of power could undermine cultural diversity and local autonomy. Minority voices and perspectives may be suppressed, leading to the homogenization of global governance. Furthermore, there are fears that centralizing power could result in corruption, abuse of power, and lack of accountability. Entrenched national interests may resist the loss of sovereignty, leading to prolonged political conflicts and potentially violent opposition.
In conclusion, transitioning to a single global authority presents both opportunities and challenges. While it offers the possibility of more efficient governance and coordinated efforts to address global issues, it also raises concerns about cultural diversity, accountability, and sovereignty. Achieving a smooth transition would require careful consideration of these challenges and a commitment to transparency, inclusivity, and accountability in global decision-making processes. Ultimately, the question of whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages remains a subject of ongoing debate in the global community.
(còn tiếp)
Đọc lại phần 3 ở đây: Những câu hỏi Extremely Hard Question trong Writing IELTS Part 3.
