Đề bài IELTS Writing Task 2 dạng Agree or Disagree Part 78:
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task
All citizens should have the right to own firearms. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Write at least 250 words.
Giải mẫu IELTS Writing
The debate over whether all citizens should have the right to own firearms is a contentious issue that elicits strong opinions on both sides. While some argue that firearm ownership is a fundamental right essential for self-defense, others contend that it poses significant risks to public safety. This essay will discuss both perspectives before concluding with a reasoned opinion.
On one hand, proponents of the right to own firearms argue that it is a fundamental freedom that supports individual autonomy and self-defense. They believe that citizens should have the means to protect themselves, their families, and their property from potential threats. For instance, in rural areas where police response times can be slow, firearms can be a crucial tool for self-defense against criminals. Moreover, the right to bear arms is enshrined in the constitutions of some countries, such as the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, which advocates see as a safeguard against tyranny and oppression.
On the other hand, opponents argue that widespread firearm ownership can lead to increased violence and accidents. Statistics from countries with high rates of gun ownership often show a correlation with higher incidences of gun-related homicides and suicides. For example, the United States, which has one of the highest rates of gun ownership, also has a disproportionately high rate of gun violence compared to other developed countries. Critics argue that stricter gun control laws can significantly reduce these incidents, as evidenced by countries like Australia, which saw a dramatic decrease in gun violence following the implementation of strict gun control measures in the late 1990s.
While recognizing the arguments on both sides, I believe that the right to own firearms should be restricted and regulated rather than granted universally. The potential risks to public safety are too significant to ignore. However, this does not mean that all citizens should be entirely deprived of the right to own firearms. Instead, stringent background checks, mandatory training, and strict regulations on the types of firearms allowed can strike a balance between individual rights and public safety. For example, licensing systems that require psychological evaluations and thorough vetting processes can help ensure that only responsible and qualified individuals have access to firearms.
In conclusion, while the right to own firearms is a contentious issue with valid arguments on both sides, I contend that it should not be an unrestricted right for all citizens. Implementing strict regulations and safeguards can help mitigate the risks associated with firearm ownership while still allowing individuals to exercise their right to self-defense under controlled conditions. This balanced approach can help protect both individual freedoms and public safety.
Cấu trúc ngữ pháp và cấu trúc câu
Thống kê cấu trúc câu và cấu trúc ngữ pháp
Cấu trúc câu:
- Câu chủ động:
- “The debate over whether all citizens should have the right to own firearms is a contentious issue that elicits strong opinions on both sides.”
- “While some argue that firearm ownership is a fundamental right essential for self-defense, others contend that it poses significant risks to public safety.”
- “They believe that citizens should have the means to protect themselves, their families, and their property from potential threats.”
- “Critics argue that stricter gun control laws can significantly reduce these incidents, as evidenced by countries like Australia, which saw a dramatic decrease in gun violence following the implementation of strict gun control measures in the late 1990s.”
- Câu bị động:
- “The right to bear arms is enshrined in the constitutions of some countries…”
- “…stricter regulations on the types of firearms allowed can strike a balance…”
- Câu phức:
- “While some argue that firearm ownership is a fundamental right essential for self-defense, others contend that it poses significant risks to public safety.”
- “For example, the United States, which has one of the highest rates of gun ownership, also has a disproportionately high rate of gun violence compared to other developed countries.”
- Câu ghép:
- “While recognizing the arguments on both sides, I believe that the right to own firearms should be restricted and regulated rather than granted universally.”
Cấu trúc ngữ pháp:
- Mệnh đề quan hệ:
- “…that elicits strong opinions on both sides.”
- “…which advocates see as a safeguard against tyranny and oppression.”
- “…which saw a dramatic decrease in gun violence following the implementation of strict gun control measures in the late 1990s.”
- Mệnh đề điều kiện:
- “…that only responsible and qualified individuals have access to firearms.”
- Mệnh đề nhượng bộ:
- “While recognizing the arguments on both sides, I believe that the right to own firearms should be restricted and regulated rather than granted universally.”
- Danh động từ:
- “Implementing strict regulations and safeguards can help mitigate the risks associated with firearm ownership…”
Các từ kết nối các câu và các đoạn văn:
Từ nối trong đoạn văn:
- While: “While some argue that firearm ownership is a fundamental right essential for self-defense, others contend that it poses significant risks to public safety.”
- Moreover: “Moreover, the right to bear arms is enshrined in the constitutions of some countries…”
- For instance: “For instance, in rural areas where police response times can be slow…”
- On the other hand: “On the other hand, opponents argue that widespread firearm ownership can lead to increased violence and accidents.”
- For example: “For example, the United States, which has one of the highest rates of gun ownership…”
- As evidenced by: “Critics argue that stricter gun control laws can significantly reduce these incidents, as evidenced by countries like Australia…”
- However: “However, this does not mean that all citizens should be entirely deprived of the right to own firearms.”
- Instead: “Instead, stringent background checks, mandatory training, and strict regulations on the types of firearms allowed can strike a balance…”
- In conclusion: “In conclusion, while the right to own firearms is a contentious issue with valid arguments on both sides, I contend that it should not be an unrestricted right for all citizens.”
- While still: “…while still allowing individuals to exercise their right to self-defense under controlled conditions.”
Các từ vựng tiếng Anh cần lưu ý trong bài viết
Từ vựng cần lưu ý:
- Firearms – Súng (bao gồm các loại súng)
- Self-defense – Tự vệ
- Contentious – Gây tranh cãi
- Proponents – Người ủng hộ
- Autonomy – Sự tự chủ
- Threats – Mối đe dọa
- Constitutions – Hiến pháp
- Tyranny – Sự bạo ngược
- Oppression – Sự áp bức
- Opponents – Người phản đối
- Statistics – Thống kê
- Homicides – Giết người
- Suicides – Tự sát
- Correlation – Sự tương quan
- Dramatic decrease – Giảm đáng kể
- Implementation – Việc thực hiện
- Regulated – Được quản lý
- Universally – Phổ quát
- Stringent – Nghiêm ngặt
- Background checks – Kiểm tra lý lịch
- Mandatory training – Đào tạo bắt buộc
- Psychological evaluations – Đánh giá tâm lý
- Thorough vetting – Kiểm tra kỹ lưỡng
- Mitigate – Giảm thiểu
- Safeguards – Biện pháp bảo vệ
- Unrestricted – Không bị giới hạn
- Conditions – Điều kiện
Đọc thêm các bài Luyện Thi IELTS khác trong link nhé.
