Kỹ năng viết trong kỳ thi IELTS luôn là thách thức lớn đối với người học, đặc biệt ở IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 54, nơi yêu cầu khả năng lập luận sắc bén và sử dụng ngôn ngữ linh hoạt.

Trong IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 52, việc xây dựng luận điểm mạch lạc và sử dụng ngôn ngữ học thuật chính xác là yếu tố quyết định band điểm cao.

Kỹ năng viết là một trong những thách thức lớn nhất đối với thí sinh luyện thi IELTS, đặc biệt ở phần thi IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 50, nơi yêu cầu tư duy logic và khả năng diễn đạt ý tưởng mạch lạc.

Kỹ năng viết trong kỳ thi IELTS luôn là thử thách lớn đối với thí sinh, đặc biệt ở IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 51, nơi đòi hỏi tư duy phản biện và khả năng diễn đạt mạch lạc.

Để đạt điểm cao trong kỳ thi IELTS, kỹ năng viết luôn là thách thức lớn với nhiều thí sinh, đặc biệt ở IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 49, nơi đòi hỏi khả năng lập luận sắc bén và sử dụng ngôn ngữ linh hoạt.

Trong quá trình chinh phục IELTS, kỹ năng viết luôn được đánh giá là thách thức lớn đối với nhiều thí sinh, đặc biệt ở phần IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 48, nơi yêu cầu không chỉ là ngữ pháp chuẩn xác mà còn là tư duy phản biện và khả năng triển khai luận điểm mạch lạc. Việc nắm vững cấu trúc bài viết, hiểu rõ các dạng đề phổ biến và phát triển ý tưởng chặt chẽ là yếu tố then chốt giúp nâng cao hiệu quả luyện thi. Đọc thêm: IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 47. Đề 1 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people believe that the increasing use of technology in education is beneficial, while others argue that it has negative effects on students’ learning. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) The rise of technology in education has sparked debates about its impacts. While some argue it enhances learning, others believe it harms students’ abilities. This essay will discuss both perspectives and present my view. On one hand, technology offers significant benefits in education. Online platforms provide access to vast resources, allowing students to learn at their own pace. For example, video tutorials and e-books help clarify complex topics. Moreover, technology fosters collaboration through tools like discussion forums, enabling students to share ideas globally. These advantages make learning more flexible and engaging, especially for those in remote areas. On the other hand, excessive reliance on technology can hinder learning. Students may become distracted by social media or games during study time, reducing focus. Additionally, overusing digital devices might weaken critical thinking, as students often copy information without understanding it. For instance, many rely on search engines instead of analyzing problems themselves. This suggests technology can undermine independent learning. In my opinion, technology is beneficial when used appropriately. It provides valuable tools but requires discipline to avoid distractions. Schools should teach students how to balance technology use and develop critical thinking skills. In conclusion, while technology improves access to resources and collaboration, it can distract students and reduce independent thinking. I believe its benefits outweigh the drawbacks if used wisely. (218 words) Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, meeting the task requirements. However, the arguments lack depth, with examples being somewhat general (e.g., “Google Scholar”). To reach Band 7, more specific examples and deeper analysis are needed. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is logically organized with clear paragraphing and basic linking words (e.g., “Firstly,” “Therefore”). However, transitions between ideas are sometimes abrupt, and cohesive devices are repetitive. Using a wider range of linking phrases would improve the score. Lexical Resource: 6.5The vocabulary is appropriate, with some academic phrases (e.g., “enhances learning,” “a wealth of information”). However, word choice is occasionally repetitive, and more precise or varied vocabulary could elevate the score to Band 7. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.5The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentences, with mostly accurate grammar. Minor errors (e.g., “might reduce critical thinking skills” could be clearer) and limited use of advanced structures prevent a higher score. More varied sentence structures would help. Phân tích từ vựng Phân tích ngữ pháp Tổng kết & gợi ý cải thiện Tổng kết: Bài viết đạt Band 6.5 nhờ cấu trúc rõ ràng, lập luận cơ bản, và từ vựng phù hợp. Tuy nhiên, các ý chưa được phát triển sâu, từ vựng và ngữ pháp thiếu đa dạng, và có một số lỗi nhỏ. (Một số nhận xét mang tính ước lượng vì không thể mô phỏng chính xác chấm điểm như người thật.) Gợi ý cải thiện để đạt Band 7: Đề 2 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people believe that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, think that this would have little effect and that other measures are needed. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) Public health is a crucial issue in many countries, and there are different opinions about how to improve it. Some people argue that building more sports facilities is the best solution, while others believe that this approach is not effective and other methods should be considered. This essay will discuss both views and present my opinion. On the one hand, supporters of increasing sports facilities believe that it encourages people to exercise more. When there are more gyms, parks, or sports centers, individuals have easier access to physical activities. For example, a community with a new swimming pool may see more people swimming regularly, which can enhance their physical health. Moreover, sports facilities can create a culture of fitness, motivating people to adopt a healthier lifestyle. However, this solution may not work for everyone because some people lack time or interest in sports. On the other hand, opponents argue that sports facilities alone cannot solve public health problems. They suggest that other measures, such as raising awareness about healthy eating or improving healthcare services, are more effective. For instance, educating people about balanced diets can prevent obesity, which is a major health issue. Additionally, not everyone can afford to use sports facilities, so focusing only on them may exclude certain groups. Therefore, a combination of solutions is necessary to address public health comprehensively. In my opinion, while sports facilities are beneficial, they are not enough. A holistic approach, including education and better healthcare, is needed to tackle public health issues effectively. By combining these methods, governments can achieve better results. In conclusion, both sides have valid points, but I believe that improving public health requires multiple strategies rather than relying only on sports facilities. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, meeting the task requirements. However, some ideas (e.g., the impact of sports facilities) lack deeper development, and the opinion could be more nuanced to reach Band 7. Coherence and Cohesion: