Kỹ năng viết trong kỳ thi IELTS luôn là thử thách lớn đối với thí sinh, đặc biệt ở IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 51, nơi đòi hỏi tư duy phản biện và khả năng diễn đạt mạch lạc.

Để đạt điểm cao trong kỳ thi IELTS, kỹ năng viết luôn là thách thức lớn với nhiều thí sinh, đặc biệt ở IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 49, nơi đòi hỏi khả năng lập luận sắc bén và sử dụng ngôn ngữ linh hoạt.

Trong quá trình chinh phục IELTS, kỹ năng viết luôn được đánh giá là thách thức lớn đối với nhiều thí sinh, đặc biệt ở phần IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 48, nơi yêu cầu không chỉ là ngữ pháp chuẩn xác mà còn là tư duy phản biện và khả năng triển khai luận điểm mạch lạc. Việc nắm vững cấu trúc bài viết, hiểu rõ các dạng đề phổ biến và phát triển ý tưởng chặt chẽ là yếu tố then chốt giúp nâng cao hiệu quả luyện thi. Đọc thêm: IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 47. Đề 1 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people believe that the increasing use of technology in education is beneficial, while others argue that it has negative effects on students’ learning. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) The rise of technology in education has sparked debates about its impacts. While some argue it enhances learning, others believe it harms students’ abilities. This essay will discuss both perspectives and present my view. On one hand, technology offers significant benefits in education. Online platforms provide access to vast resources, allowing students to learn at their own pace. For example, video tutorials and e-books help clarify complex topics. Moreover, technology fosters collaboration through tools like discussion forums, enabling students to share ideas globally. These advantages make learning more flexible and engaging, especially for those in remote areas. On the other hand, excessive reliance on technology can hinder learning. Students may become distracted by social media or games during study time, reducing focus. Additionally, overusing digital devices might weaken critical thinking, as students often copy information without understanding it. For instance, many rely on search engines instead of analyzing problems themselves. This suggests technology can undermine independent learning. In my opinion, technology is beneficial when used appropriately. It provides valuable tools but requires discipline to avoid distractions. Schools should teach students how to balance technology use and develop critical thinking skills. In conclusion, while technology improves access to resources and collaboration, it can distract students and reduce independent thinking. I believe its benefits outweigh the drawbacks if used wisely. (218 words) Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, meeting the task requirements. However, the arguments lack depth, with examples being somewhat general (e.g., “Google Scholar”). To reach Band 7, more specific examples and deeper analysis are needed. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is logically organized with clear paragraphing and basic linking words (e.g., “Firstly,” “Therefore”). However, transitions between ideas are sometimes abrupt, and cohesive devices are repetitive. Using a wider range of linking phrases would improve the score. Lexical Resource: 6.5The vocabulary is appropriate, with some academic phrases (e.g., “enhances learning,” “a wealth of information”). However, word choice is occasionally repetitive, and more precise or varied vocabulary could elevate the score to Band 7. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.5The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentences, with mostly accurate grammar. Minor errors (e.g., “might reduce critical thinking skills” could be clearer) and limited use of advanced structures prevent a higher score. More varied sentence structures would help. Phân tích từ vựng Phân tích ngữ pháp Tổng kết & gợi ý cải thiện Tổng kết: Bài viết đạt Band 6.5 nhờ cấu trúc rõ ràng, lập luận cơ bản, và từ vựng phù hợp. Tuy nhiên, các ý chưa được phát triển sâu, từ vựng và ngữ pháp thiếu đa dạng, và có một số lỗi nhỏ. (Một số nhận xét mang tính ước lượng vì không thể mô phỏng chính xác chấm điểm như người thật.) Gợi ý cải thiện để đạt Band 7: Đề 2 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people believe that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, think that this would have little effect and that other measures are needed. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) Public health is a crucial issue in many countries, and there are different opinions about how to improve it. Some people argue that building more sports facilities is the best solution, while others believe that this approach is not effective and other methods should be considered. This essay will discuss both views and present my opinion. On the one hand, supporters of increasing sports facilities believe that it encourages people to exercise more. When there are more gyms, parks, or sports centers, individuals have easier access to physical activities. For example, a community with a new swimming pool may see more people swimming regularly, which can enhance their physical health. Moreover, sports facilities can create a culture of fitness, motivating people to adopt a healthier lifestyle. However, this solution may not work for everyone because some people lack time or interest in sports. On the other hand, opponents argue that sports facilities alone cannot solve public health problems. They suggest that other measures, such as raising awareness about healthy eating or improving healthcare services, are more effective. For instance, educating people about balanced diets can prevent obesity, which is a major health issue. Additionally, not everyone can afford to use sports facilities, so focusing only on them may exclude certain groups. Therefore, a combination of solutions is necessary to address public health comprehensively. In my opinion, while sports facilities are beneficial, they are not enough. A holistic approach, including education and better healthcare, is needed to tackle public health issues effectively. By combining these methods, governments can achieve better results. In conclusion, both sides have valid points, but I believe that improving public health requires multiple strategies rather than relying only on sports facilities. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, meeting the task requirements. However, some ideas (e.g., the impact of sports facilities) lack deeper development, and the opinion could be more nuanced to reach Band 7. Coherence and Cohesion:

Trong số bốn kỹ năng của kỳ thi IELTS, kỹ năng viết thường được xem là thách thức lớn nhất đối với thí sinh Việt Nam do yêu cầu cao về lập luận, ngữ pháp và từ vựng học thuật. Đặc biệt, IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 47 đòi hỏi người học không chỉ hiểu sâu đề bài mà còn phải triển khai lập luận mạch lạc, có dẫn chứng và phản biện rõ ràng. Việc nắm vững cấu trúc bài viết và tư duy phản biện là yếu tố then chốt để đạt điểm cao. Đọc thêm: IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 46. Đề 1 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people believe that technology has made our lives more stressful, while others think it has made life easier and more convenient. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) Technology has become an essential part of modern life, but its impact is debated. Some argue that it increases stress, while others believe it simplifies daily tasks. This essay will discuss both perspectives and provide my opinion. On the one hand, critics of technology claim it creates stress. The constant use of smartphones and computers can lead to information overload, making people feel overwhelmed. For example, receiving endless work emails outside office hours can disturb personal life. Additionally, social media often causes pressure to keep up with trends, which can affect mental health. This suggests that technology, despite its benefits, can contribute to anxiety for many individuals. On the other hand, supporters argue that technology makes life more convenient. Online shopping and banking save time, allowing people to manage daily tasks efficiently. For instance, apps like Uber or food delivery services provide quick solutions to everyday needs. Moreover, technology enables remote working, which offers flexibility and reduces commuting stress. These advantages show how technology can improve quality of life. In my opinion, technology has both positive and negative effects. While it can cause stress if overused, it also offers practical solutions to many problems. The key is to use it wisely to balance convenience and well-being. In conclusion, technology can be stressful when it overwhelms users, but it also brings significant convenience. I believe that with proper management, its benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and gives a clear opinion. However, some points (e.g., social media pressure) are underdeveloped, and the opinion lacks depth to reach Band 7. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is logically organized with clear paragraphs and linking words like “for example” and “moreover.” Transitions are sometimes repetitive, and ideas could be connected more smoothly. Lexical Resource: 6.5The vocabulary is appropriate, with some academic phrases (e.g., information overload, practical solutions). Word choice is occasionally basic or repetitive, limiting the score. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.5The essay uses a variety of sentence structures with minor errors (e.g., article misuse, awkward phrasing). These do not hinder understanding but prevent a higher score. Phân tích từ vựng Phân tích ngữ pháp Tổng kết & gợi ý cải thiện The essay achieves a solid Band 6.5, with a clear structure, relevant arguments, and appropriate language. However, it falls short of Band 7 due to underdeveloped ideas, basic transitions, and minor grammatical inaccuracies. To reach Band 7: Đề 2 IELTS Writing Task 2 Many people believe that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. Others, however, think that there are better alternative methods to achieve this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) Crime is a serious issue in many societies, and there are different opinions on how to reduce it. Some people argue that longer prison sentences are the most effective solution, while others believe alternative methods work better. This essay will discuss both views and present my opinion. On the one hand, supporters of longer prison sentences claim that they deter criminal behavior. When offenders face severe punishment, they may think twice before committing crimes. For example, a lengthy sentence for robbery could discourage potential thieves. Additionally, keeping criminals in prison longer can protect society by preventing them from causing further harm. However, this approach may not address the root causes of crime, such as poverty or lack of education. On the other hand, those who favor alternative methods argue that they are more effective in reducing crime. Programs like rehabilitation and community service can help offenders reintegrate into society. For instance, providing job training to ex-prisoners can reduce their chances of reoffending. Moreover, educating young people about the consequences of crime can prevent criminal behavior before it starts. These methods focus on solving the underlying issues rather than just punishment. In my opinion, while longer sentences may deter some crimes, alternative methods are more effective in the long term. A balanced strategy that combines punishment with rehabilitation is the best way to tackle crime effectively. In conclusion, both approaches have merits, but I believe alternative methods, combined with some punishment, offer a better solution to reducing crime. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion. However, some ideas (e.g., rehabilitation benefits) are not fully developed, and the opinion could be more nuanced to reach Band 7. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is well-organized with clear paragraphs and linking words like “for example” and “moreover.” Transitions are sometimes basic, and ideas within paragraphs could flow more smoothly. Lexical Resource: 6.5The vocabulary is appropriate, with some academic phrases (e.g., deter criminal behavior, root causes). Word choice is occasionally repetitive or simple, limiting the score. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.5The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentences with minor errors (e.g., article misuse, awkward phrasing). These do not impede communication but prevent a Band 7. Phân tích từ vựng Phân tích ngữ pháp Tổng kết & gợi ý cải thiện The essay is a strong Band 6.5, with a clear structure, relevant arguments, and appropriate language.

Trong cấu trúc kỳ thi IELTS, kỹ năng viết thường là thách thức lớn nhất đối với phần lớn thí sinh, đặc biệt ở phần IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 46 – nơi yêu cầu không chỉ khả năng ngôn ngữ mà còn là tư duy lập luận chặt chẽ. Việc hiểu rõ tiêu chí chấm điểm, nắm bắt yêu cầu đề bài và phát triển ý một cách mạch lạc là yếu tố then chốt giúp nâng cao band điểm, nhất là trong bối cảnh cạnh tranh ngày càng cao hiện nay. Đọc thêm: IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 45. Đề 1 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people think that public transport should be free to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Bài essay (Band 6.5) In recent years, traffic congestion and air pollution have become serious problems in many cities. Some people believe that making public transport free would help solve these issues. I partly agree with this idea because while free transport can bring benefits, it may also create other challenges. On the one hand, providing free public transportation can encourage more people to leave their private cars at home. As a result, the number of vehicles on the road may decrease, which can help reduce traffic jams and pollution from car exhausts. This policy can especially benefit low-income citizens who rely on buses or trains to travel to work or school. On the other hand, making public transport free may lead to overcrowding and high maintenance costs. If too many people use buses or trains, the quality of service may go down. Additionally, the government would need to spend a lot of money to maintain the system, which might reduce funding for other important services like healthcare or education. In some cases, people might misuse the system because it is free, which could cause more harm than good. In conclusion, while free public transport has the potential to reduce traffic and pollution, it is not a perfect solution. A better approach may be to reduce fares and improve the service quality to attract more users without causing negative side effects. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5Bài viết trả lời đúng trọng tâm đề bài, có quan điểm rõ ràng (partly agree). Lập luận hợp lý nhưng thiếu chiều sâu, ví dụ chưa thật cụ thể. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5Cấu trúc bài rõ ràng, các đoạn kết nối mượt mà. Tuy nhiên, từ nối còn đơn giản và bị lặp lại (“on the other hand”, “while”). Lexical Resource: 6.5Từ vựng đủ dùng để diễn đạt ý tưởng. Một số cụm từ học thuật được sử dụng đúng, nhưng còn lặp từ (“free”, “public transport”). Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.0Sử dụng được một số cấu trúc câu phức hợp, nhưng còn lỗi nhẹ về thì và từ nối. Phạm vi ngữ pháp chưa thực sự đa dạng. Phân tích từ vựng (in đậm + dịch + giải thích) Phân tích ngữ pháp (in đậm + giải thích tiếng Việt) Tổng kết & gợi ý cải thiện Bài viết thể hiện rõ quan điểm và có cấu trúc hợp lý, phù hợp với Band 6.5. Tuy nhiên, để nâng lên Band 7.0, người viết nên: Đề 2 IELTS Writing Task 2 In many countries, young people are choosing not to vote. What are the reasons for this, and what can be done to encourage them to vote? (Problem-Solution) Bài essay (Band 6.5) In modern society, it is becoming more common for young people to avoid voting in national or local elections. This trend is worrying because voting is an important part of democracy. This essay will discuss some reasons why young people do not vote and suggest ways to increase their participation. One main reason is that many young individuals feel disconnected from politics. They think politicians do not represent their views or care about their issues such as education, employment, or climate change. As a result, they feel that voting does not make any real difference. Another reason is the lack of knowledge. Many young people do not understand how the political system works or how to register to vote. To solve this problem, governments and schools can play a big role. For example, schools should include political education in the curriculum to help students understand the value of voting. Governments can also run awareness campaigns on social media, where young people spend a lot of their time. These campaigns should explain the voting process in simple ways and show how each vote can lead to change. In conclusion, the lack of interest and understanding are key reasons why young people do not vote. Education and modern communication tools can be effective in encouraging them to take part in elections. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5Bài viết trả lời đúng yêu cầu của đề bài, đưa ra nguyên nhân và giải pháp rõ ràng. Tuy nhiên, luận điểm chưa được khai triển sâu sắc, thiếu ví dụ thực tế cụ thể. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5Cấu trúc đoạn rõ ràng, liên kết ý mạch lạc. Tuy nhiên, từ nối còn đơn giản và bị lặp (“for example”, “as a result”). Lexical Resource: 6.5Từ vựng đủ dùng, có một số cụm học thuật phù hợp. Tuy nhiên, một số từ/cụm bị lặp và thiếu tính đa dạng. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.0Ngữ pháp nhìn chung chính xác, có sử dụng câu phức và bị động, nhưng phạm vi cấu trúc còn hạn chế và đôi lúc thiếu linh hoạt. Phân tích từ vựng (in đậm + dịch + giải thích) Phân tích ngữ pháp (in đậm + giải thích tiếng Việt) Tổng kết & gợi ý cải thiện Bài viết phù hợp Band 6.5 với cấu trúc rõ ràng, từ vựng và ngữ pháp ở mức đủ để truyền đạt ý. Tuy nhiên: Đề 3 IELTS Writing Task 3 Some people believe that it is better to work

Trong kỳ thi IELTS, kỹ năng lập luận và tổ chức ý tưởng rõ ràng đóng vai trò then chốt trong việc đạt điểm cao ở phần viết. Đặc biệt, IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 45 yêu cầu thí sinh không chỉ nắm vững cấu trúc bài luận mà còn thể hiện tư duy phản biện mạch lạc và dẫn chứng phù hợp. Việc hiểu rõ yêu cầu đề bài và biết cách triển khai luận điểm một cách logic là nền tảng để cải thiện hiệu quả kỹ năng viết học thuật. Đọc thêm: IELTS Writing Task 2 Phần 44. Đề 1 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people believe that the best way to encourage children to study is to reward them for good grades. Others, however, think that praising effort is more effective. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) Encouraging children to study is a key concern for parents and teachers. Some argue that rewarding good grades is the best approach, while others believe praising effort is more effective. This essay will discuss both perspectives and explain why I think a combination of both methods is ideal. On the one hand, supporters of rewarding grades argue that it motivates students to work harder. For example, giving gifts or money for high marks can make children aim for better results. This method is effective because it provides tangible incentives, which appeal to young learners. In some cultures, parents use rewards to instill a sense of achievement, helping children associate studying with positive outcomes. On the other hand, those who favor praising effort believe it builds long-term resilience. Recognizing hard work, regardless of results, encourages children to keep trying. For instance, a student who struggles but persists may feel valued when their effort is acknowledged. This approach can foster intrinsic motivation, as children learn to value the process of learning rather than just grades. In my opinion, both methods have merits, but combining them is most effective. Rewarding grades can boost short-term performance, while praising effort supports long-term growth. For example, a child could receive a small reward for good marks and praise for their hard work. In conclusion, a balanced approach that uses both rewards and praise is the best way to encourage children to study. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, meeting the task requirements. However, the arguments are somewhat general, with examples like “gifts or money” lacking depth. The conclusion summarizes well but does not add new insights, limiting the score to 6.5. Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5The essay is logically structured with clear paragraphs. Linking words like “for example” and “on the other hand” are used appropriately, but transitions between ideas (e.g., from rewards to effort) are slightly abrupt. Some repetition of ideas reduces cohesion. Lexical Resource: 6.5The vocabulary is appropriate for Band 6.5, with academic phrases like foster intrinsic motivation and tangible incentives. However, there is some repetition (e.g., “children” and “study” appear frequently), and the absence of higher-level synonyms prevents a Band 7 score. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.5The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentences with generally accurate grammar. Minor errors, such as “instill a sense of achievement” (slightly formal for context), and limited use of advanced structures (e.g., conditionals) keep the score at 6.5. Phân tích từ vựng Phân tích ngữ pháp Tổng kết & gợi ý cải thiện Tổng kết: Bài viết đạt Band 6.5 nhờ cấu trúc rõ ràng, từ vựng phù hợp, và lập luận cơ bản. Tuy nhiên, các lỗi nhỏ trong từ vựng (lặp từ, cụm chưa tối ưu), ngữ pháp (thiếu cấu trúc phức tạp), và ví dụ chung chung khiến bài chưa đạt Band 7. (Nhận xét này dựa trên tiêu chí Cambridge, nhưng một số yếu tố như mức độ thuyết phục có thể phụ thuộc vào giám khảo.) Gợi ý cải thiện để đạt Band 7: Đề 2 IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people think that governments should invest more in public transportation to reduce traffic congestion. Others, however, believe that building more roads is a better solution. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Bài essay (Band 6.5) Traffic congestion is a growing problem in many cities, and there are different opinions on how to address it. Some argue that governments should prioritize public transportation, while others believe that building more roads is more effective. This essay will discuss both views and explain why I support greater investment in public transport. On the one hand, supporters of public transportation argue that it can significantly reduce the number of vehicles on roads. Efficient systems like buses and trains can carry many passengers at once, which helps decrease traffic jams. For example, cities with well-developed metro systems often have less congestion. Moreover, public transport is environmentally friendly, as it produces fewer emissions compared to private cars. On the other hand, those who favor building more roads claim that it accommodates growing populations. As cities expand, the demand for road space increases. Wider roads or new highways can help traffic flow more smoothly. For instance, some countries have reduced congestion by constructing ring roads around cities. However, this solution may only work in the short term, as more roads can encourage more car use. In my opinion, investing in public transportation is the better long-term solution. It not only reduces congestion but also promotes sustainable development. Governments should focus on affordable and reliable transport systems to encourage people to leave their cars at home. In conclusion, while building roads may help, public transportation is the most effective way to tackle traffic congestion. Chấm điểm (4 tiêu chí) Task Response: 6.5The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, fulfilling the task. However, the arguments are somewhat general, with examples like “cities with metro systems” lacking specificity. The conclusion summarizes well but does not add new insights, limiting the score to 6.5. Coherence and Cohesion: